Mack Pack

Posted by tgcmd (Finesse@…>)

Does the Mack Pack work well without a topping lift on the Freedom rigs? Do
those with
Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft end of the pack? Does their
system
require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What else would I have to consider
in thinking
about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?
Thomas
F-33 #66 L’Audace

Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)


I installed mack packs last year and have
a season on them. They work very well and have made it a pleasure to go out for
short sails. A couple of things to note:

  1. Depending on your angle to the wind
    when you raise the sails and how you have the lazy jack lines cut and adjusted
    (angles, tension) relative to the full battens the battens can hang up when
    raised as with any lazy jacks. After some experimentation with slacking the
    sheet and watching the sail when raised this became a non issue. No need to
    slack/pull back the lazy jack lines.
  2. Normal installation requires 3
    attachment points on each side of the mast. The top is a hook and the lower 2
    are twists like for a dodger. All are with rivets. On mine I sealed the hole
    edges with epoxy before rivets. This is how I did mine after much investigating
    on the location and whether this could affect the mast and deciding the small
    holes in these locations (like the ones for the sail tracks). Having used them
    for a season the top hooks are important and I can’t see a way around
    that. The lower 2 on each side I think could be left out and shock cord from
    one side around the mast to the other might suffice (the lower shock cord might
    need some downward pull to keep the zipper operating freely but I don’t
    think). I should have tried this but my sailmaker and mack said it wouldn’t
    work well without them. I think they’re wrong and it would reduce the
    number of holes. Anyway you could try it and add them later if needed.
  3. The look is not quite like in the
    brochures/pictures. It tends to be a bit baggy to allow extra space to keep it
    easy to drop into and the extra lines in the lazy jack part look a bit odd to
    me. I can email you pictures if you like or we can talk by phone.
    Alan F-33 Hull #51 1982

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.







From:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tgcmd
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006
12:17 AM
To:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [freedomyachts2003] Mack
Pack

Does the Mack Pack work well
without a topping lift on the Freedom rigs? Do those with
Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft
end of the pack? Does their system
require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What
else would I have to consider in thinking
about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?
Thomas
F-33 #66 L’Audace




\

Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)


Forgot to answer about the topping lift.
When I added my mack packs I also added boomkickers so there is no problem . In
any event the lazy jack part of the mack packs would support the booms but they
recommend attaching a topping lift or the main sheet when stowed.
Another note is most of the time you can
leave the mack pack on the mast hooks while sailing but downwind there is
strain on the lower hooks so they need to be released. Of course for performance
its better to take them off.
Alan


The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.







From:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tgcmd
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006
12:17 AM
To:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [freedomyachts2003] Mack
Pack

Does the Mack Pack work well
without a topping lift on the Freedom rigs? Do those with
Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft
end of the pack? Does their system
require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What
else would I have to consider in thinking
about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?
Thomas
F-33 #66 L’Audace




\

Posted by macks011 (macks04@…>)

I installed the Mack Pack on a F36 with a solid vang. Works well. A
few points: On the 36 at least, there never was a topping lift. The
lazy jacks served that purpose and could still as well wih the Mack
Pack if you are so inclined. The Mack Pack requires 6 holes in the
mast, 3 on each side of the sail track. Drill and tap an 8/32
machine screw and epoxy in place. Re-think the lazy jack leg
spacing along the boom. Mack equally spaces the down legs along your
boom length. If you have a full roach, full batten main, you will
not have enough support at the boom end. Since the sail is already
supported at the mast track, Favor the spacing to the aft end of the
boom. Consider extra length primary lazy jack lines led aft along
the boom to cleats for adjusting purposes. finally, there is the
hanging laundry effect. The boat just doesnt look clean with the
cover hanging while sailing. But, you get used to it. In reality, in
the time and effort it takes to stow the sail and zip up the Mack,
you can retrieve and put on a normal sail cover. All things being
equal and had I not needed a new sail cover, I would have upgraded
the existing lazy jack system and altered the sail cover.






— In freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com, “tgcmd” <Finesse@s…>
wrote:

Does the Mack Pack work well without a topping lift on the Freedom
rigs? Do those with
Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft end of the pack?
Does their system
require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What else would I have
to consider in thinking
about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?
Thomas
F-33 #66 L’Audace

Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)


Interesting. I find the time it takes to
stow the sail with the mack packs to be dramatically less then with sail ties
and sail covers. (And on the 33 there are two) I imagine it partially depends
on the how tight the original sail covers were. Used to take me about 20
minutes or so to stow both sails and get the sail covers on and involved a lot
of long reaches (and I’m short). With the Mack Packs takes me about 5
minutes total.
Alan F-33 Hull #51 1982


The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.







From:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of macks011
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006
8:17 AM
To:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [freedomyachts2003] Re:
Mack Pack

I installed the Mack Pack on
a F36 with a solid vang. Works well. A
few points: On the 36 at least, there never was a
topping lift. The
lazy jacks served that purpose and could still as
well wih the Mack
Pack if you are so inclined. The Mack Pack
requires 6 holes in the
mast, 3 on each side of the sail track. Drill and
tap an 8/32
machine screw and epoxy in place. Re-think
the lazy jack leg
spacing along the boom. Mack equally spaces the
down legs along your
boom length. If you have a full roach, full batten
main, you will
not have enough support at the boom end. Since the
sail is already
supported at the mast track, Favor the spacing to
the aft end of the
boom. Consider extra length primary lazy jack
lines led aft along
the boom to cleats for adjusting purposes.
finally, there is the
hanging laundry effect. The boat just doesnt look
clean with the
cover hanging while sailing. But, you get used to
it. In reality, in
the time and effort it takes to stow the sail and
zip up the Mack,
you can retrieve and put on a normal sail
cover. All things being
equal and had I not needed a new sail cover, I
would have upgraded
the existing lazy jack system and altered the sail
cover.






— In freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com,
“tgcmd” <Finesse@s…>
wrote:

Does the Mack Pack work well without a
topping lift on the Freedom
rigs? Do those with
Mack Packs use their boom end support for the
aft end of the pack?
Does their system
require new holes in the carbon fiber mast?
What else would I have
to consider in thinking
about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?
Thomas
F-33 #66 L’Audace






\

Posted by andre laviolette (andrelaviolette@…>)
Hi. I have a Mack pack on my Freedom. Great invention. Pull one zipper and your off. Have also Gaurhauer rigid vang, a must in my opinion for it to work best. Andre " Scaramanga " see photo section.tgcmd <Finesse@…> wrote: Does the Mack Pack work well without a topping lift on the Freedom rigs? Do those with Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft end of the pack? Does their system require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What else would I have to consider in thinking about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?ThomasF-33 #66 L’Audace
Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos

Posted by andre laviolette (andrelaviolette@…>)
Hi Again, Just want to add that my Mack Pack sail cover does not hang when sailing. It lies against sail. Had HUGE roach ,a la Hobie cat, put in. Great ! Andre.andre laviolette <andrelaviolette@…> wrote: Hi. I have a Mack pack on my Freedom. Great invention. Pull one zipper and your off. Have also Gaurhauer rigid vang, a must in my opinion for it to work best. Andre " Scaramanga " see photo section.tgcmd <Finesse@…> wrote: Does the Mack Pack work well without a topping lift on the Freedom rigs? Do those with Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft end of the pack? Does
their system require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What else would I have to consider in thinking about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?ThomasF-33 #66 L’Audace Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos
Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos

Posted by William A. Cormack (wacormack@…>)

I had Doyle Stack Pack on my Tartan 30. Loved it. Unfurl took 1 minute. Furling took about 2-3 minutes.

It makes a one hour sail something I didn’t think twice about because it was so easy.

The Stack Pack required only 2 attachments on each side of the mast. One just above the boom and one 1/2 way up the mast.

Bill
_________________________________________________William A. Cormack, CPAPrincipal and Chief Financial OfficerWhelan Associates, LLC, a Corporate Real Estate Service Firm100 Faunce Corner Executive Center, Suite 150500 Faunce Corner RoadNorth Dartmouth, MA 02747Voice: 508-984-4100, Fax: 508-984-4101, Cell 508-254-5828MailTo:wacormack@…

----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Kusinitz
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 01/10/2006 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: [freedomyachts2003] Re: Mack Pack


Interesting. I find the time it takes to stow the sail with the mack packs to be dramatically less then with sail ties and sail covers. (And on the 33 there are two) I imagine it partially depends on the how tight the original sail covers were. Used to take me about 20 minutes or so to stow both sails and get the sail covers on and involved a lot of long reaches (and I’m short). With the Mack Packs takes me about 5 minutes total.
Alan F-33 Hull #51 1982


The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.






From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of macks011Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:17 AMTo: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.comSubject: [freedomyachts2003] Re: Mack Pack

I installed the Mack Pack on a F36 with a solid vang. Works well. A few points: On the 36 at least, there never was a topping lift. The lazy jacks served that purpose and could still as well wih the Mack Pack if you are so inclined. The Mack Pack requires 6 holes in the mast, 3 on each side of the sail track. Drill and tap an 8/32 machine screw and epoxy in place. Re-think the lazy jack leg spacing along the boom. Mack equally spaces the down legs along your boom length. If you have a full roach, full batten main, you will not have enough support at the boom end. Since the sail is already supported at the mast track, Favor the spacing to the aft end of the boom. Consider extra length primary lazy jack lines led aft along the boom to cleats for adjusting purposes. finally, there is the hanging laundry effect. The boat just doesnt look clean with the cover hanging while sailing. But, you get used to it. In reality, in the time and effort it takes to stow the sail and zip up the Mack, you can retrieve and put on a normal sail cover. All things being equal and had I not needed a new sail cover, I would have upgraded the existing lazy jack system and altered the sail cover. — In freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com, “tgcmd” <Finesse@s…> wrote:>> Does the Mack Pack work well without a topping lift on the Freedom rigs? Do those with > Mack Packs use their boom end support for the aft end of the pack? Does their system > require new holes in the carbon fiber mast? What else would I have to consider in thinking > about installing the Mack Pack on a F-33?> Thomas> F-33 #66 L’Audace>