Rig Change: Boom to Wishbone?

Hi all; new guy here. I’ve become Very interested in Unstayed, Freestanding Masts and am pursuing this interest whilst shopping for a boat to fulfill this itch.

Through my research it has become apparent to me that the Original Freedoms with the Wrap-around Sails were the winners in sail efficiency, speed, etc. I wonder why, then, that this wasn’t carried over by the folks who bought the Freedom line?

A second, more relevant question to my boat search is, Can a later fixed Boom Mast/Rig be converted to a Wishbone setup with Wrap-around Sails?

Thank you in advance,

Robert

Hi. The wrap around sail format may have had a small windward advantage over single laminar sails on a track. But the disadvantages perhaps outweighed this. They are very difficult to reef when wet and pressed onto the mast…more expensive to make…and complicated reefing system. Wishbone booms are excellent, as they obviate need for a kicker, and allow the sail to be fuller or flatter for differing winds strengths, and allow a full aerofoil shape across all the sail. Straight booms make this hard. Bear in mind other unstayed cat boats are out there…Nonsuch, Tanton, Wylie all names to review…

1 Like

Hey Nick, Thank you for the great response!

When I wrote this Query I had been looking at a boat that would have probably needed new sails, so I got myself into ‘modification mode’. As I looked deeper into this topic I began to understand that the slight difference in performance probably didn’t justify the change in sails.
I am however still looking at the possibility of utilizing a Wishbone. Thanks too for the Tip regarding the other makers of Stay-less rigs.

Cheers, Robert

In early January 1980, working for the Shobokshi Group, I acquired Fairways Marine from the receivers, Rank’s boat building and repair and maintenance business at Port Hamble near Southampton and signed the agreement with Gary Hoyt to build the Freedom range exclusively outside the US, all within a week. Fairways cost £34,000 (the receivers had expected £1m), Rank’s incompetent leisure division management paid me to take over the largest boat repair business in the UK (I needed their facilities) and the Freedom range I saw as the future of sailing boats because of the unstayed rig with wrap around sails controlled by wishbone booms.

My first sail on a Freedom 40 was an eye opener. The speed was simply amazing compared to all conventional Bermudan rigged boats, We overtook every boat on the water . The ease of sailing with the self tacking rig (no headsails), the simplicity of reefing (let the halyard down to a marker and pull the reefing line took 30 seconds) and the ability to share the sail with the outhaul line to tweak the performance, I likened it to driving a high performance Porsche amongst a group of sedate saloons. Later, I got into the science of the rig’s efficiency with tests at Southampton University that showed the wraparound sail was 96-97% efficient compared to 60% for a mainsail on a track up a mast. Freedoms are cruising boats not racing boats but their performance was astounding. But, there is always a but, they looked unconventional so how to sell this to the conservative yachting world. I decided to get the best known sailors of the time to race Freedoms. For around the buoys racing, I struck a deal with John Oakley, the skipper chosen for Lionheart, the 12m challenger for the America’s Cup and owner of sail maker Miller & Whitworth. I gave his company the contract to make sails for Freedoms, the Fairways Fisher motor sailers and the Seastream range inherited from Rank, I gave him a Freedom 35 (the 33 in the US) to race in the Solent Series and the Round the Island race (Isle of Wight). The Solent series was England’s premier series (the Solent is the largest centre for sailing in the UK and the Round the Island Race is the largest participant race of the year with some 2,000 boats. John went on to win every race in the Solent series (except one when he retired with a stone jamming the centre plate) and won the Round the Island Race starting in the main fleet and catching and overtaking every OOD34, regarded as the latest and most desirable 34ft ft from Jeremy Rogers, builder of the legendary Contessa 32, that started half an hour before.

To catch global attention though, I decided to follow the example of Nature, builders of the Swan range, who had put their name and brand in the public eye by winning the Whitbread Round the World Race with a Swan 65. I persuaded Rob James, the most prominent British ocean racer, and wife Naomi (who had been made a Dame for sailing solo around the World while Rob was winning the previous Whitbread) to race a yet to be built, three masted Freedom 70. Naomi was much more famous than Rob in the UK but Rob was hugely respected by people who knew ocean racing. He has won the two-handed transatlantic race and the Round Britain & Ireland Race with Chay Blyth. I let the Freedom 40 do the persuading of Rob. Naomi accompanied by Rob had been opening a new enormous supermarket in Southampton on a sunny Saturday and they came to chat with me and see the 40 afterwards. Naomi was so put off by the look of the 40 that she was reluctant to come for a sail but Rob was intrigued. A few days later, we went for a sail. We motored along the Hamble river to the entrance. The Hamble had 7 marinas and Port Hamble was one before the entrance from Southampton Water. The marina at the entrance was Hamble Point and on cue out came the latest Swan 42 designed by Ron Holland, the New Zealander and top designer. Rob and Naomi (also from New Zealand) were close friends with Ron and his American wife, Laurel. In fact, Naomi and Laurel were entered to sail together in the next two handed transatlantic race. Rob rubbed his hands with glee that he could measure the Freedom 40 against the Swan 42. The Swan started to raise their sails. We had 15-20 knots of wind on a glorious sunny day. Rob suggested that we raise the Freedom’s sails so I told him that we should give the Swan a helpful start. Rob was sceptical. He old me that the 42 was a fast boat. Trust me, I told him. Let’s allow the mouse to run first. We have the Swan (on a demo sail) a mile start and then I told Rob to raise the Freedom’s two identical mainsails, pull by hand and only use the winch to raise the booms. The Swan was doing around 8 knots on a reach. I watched Rob and Naomi’s faces as the Freedom accelerated to 10 to 12 knots and rapidly caught up the Swan. We overtook the Swan, sailed around it and then overtook it again. The manager of Nautor was trying to distract his clients from looking at the Freedom 40, we all knew each other.

Rob and Naomi were sold on the Freedom rig so Rob said that that the 40 was too small for the Whitbread. I explained he Freedom 70 with three masts and suggested that Naomi and Laurel could race her in the Two Star and Rob and Naomi in the Whitbread. We sailed back to Port Hamble and went to see the drawings of the 70. The Nautor manager called and said that his demo sail clients wanted to see the 40 and he would send them along as long as we warned him if we were taking the 40 for a sail so he could avoid a repeat encounter. We sold them one.

The Freedom 70 did go in the two star but Naomi had a burst cyst on the ovary two days before the race and John Oakley replaced her. Rob had his Whitbread crew come to Rhode Island to sail the Freedom 70 back and had a private race with Flyer, the conventional favourite for the Whitbread, from Nantucket lighthouse to Lands End. The 70 beat Flyer by 4 days crossing in the second fastest time for a monohull, beaten only by America, over twice the length of the 70. I had used the ultimate sanction of resigning because the Shobokshi Group had failed to send the agreed £1m extra capital for the expansion of Fairways and that led to the collapse of Fairways and the 70 not going in the Whitbread. Rob and his crew and I had no doubt that the 70 would have won the Whitbread easily, I had arranged live broadcasts daily from on board.

My plan was to create a second generation of Freedoms after the initial 40, 35 and 30 that Gary had created. I had commissioned Ron Holland with considerable input from all our experience including Rob James, John Oakley, Anton Emmerton and myself. The first model was the Freedom 39 pilothouse with a schooner rig, wishbone booms and wraparound sails. It was built in England and the US.

I own a Freedom 35 today built by Fairways in 1981 which I refurbished in 2022. I would have bought the 39 had I found one. The 35 was the best of the first generation with one exception - the Freedom 70. If you find a Freedom with unstayed masts but a conventional boom and the sail on a track up the mast, you can definitely change to the wishbone boom and wrap around sails. Unstayed masts must be stepped to the bottom of the boat. The area around the mast is strengthened. If you think back to before stayed masts stepped to the deck, unstayed was the norm on sailing vessels. I called the Freedoms the monoplane of sailing boats compared to the biplanes of stayed masts. If you consider an older stayed mast sailing boat, check the chain plates carefully because the stress invariably causes issues.

1 Like

I see that spellchecker changed Nautor as the name of the Swan builder in Finland.

Thanks Goleen; I’d read most of this in another thread, but maybe missed the part about the Testing of the Sails, along with the 60% vs 96% efficiency-wow!

Would you care to address the earlier comment that was made regarding Reefing, or down-hauling a Wet Sail on a Wrap-around Sail?
Otherwise if it is just a matter of the Wrap-around Sails being more expensive, well that is something that I could then look into if I went forward with the particular boat that has caught my attention…

btw, sure I’m an oddball and love the unconventional things in life (proof: I owned a D21 Citroen in the 80’s), but with all of the Positive attributes of unstayed Masts I just can’t comprehend why they aren’t much more popular!?

Robert

Robert,

I have sailed Freedoms more than most people. In all that time, I never had an issue with the reefing system, wet or dry sails. Nor have I ever heard of anyone else having an issue. I suspect that the person did not de-power the sail and it had nothing to do with the sail being wet. When you let the halyard go to the reefing mark, the sail falls fast and attention needs to be paid. Wear sailing gloves so the speed of the sail coming down does not burn your hand. There are two reefing marks. The sail folds naturally on the wishbone boom. There is no need to go forward to stow.

At Fairways I had a choice of sizes so sailed the 40, 35 and 30. I sailed in the summer evenings, at weekends and in the winter. Post Fairways, I bought a 35 at Largs Marina near Glasgow. I was too busy with work based at my Gibraltar office so I got a deliver skipper to deliver her with one crew to Puerto Duquesa, just around the corner in the Med on the Costa del Sol. That’s over 1,000 miles, When he arrived at Largs, I told him how best to sail the Freedom. The professional skipper told me it was the best sail of his entire life. He did over 1,000 sea miles and averaged 8.6 knots.

At the London Boat Show in 1981, we had six boats on show next to the Moodys stand in a prime position. We challenged Moodys to reef their Moody’s main faster than us. They were astounded how fast the Freedom could be reefed - under 10 seconds. We won the beers that they paid for.

I hope the above helps. The 35 draws 3.5ft with the centre board up and 7ft down. You only need the board down going to windward. Be aware that the centre board winch takes some winding to lift the centre board. If yiou have a young fit crew, give that person the job! Up you can attach legs to dry out on mud or sand.

Which model Freedom are you considering? Whereabouts are you located? There’s a 1981 Freedom 35, identical to mine, for sail in Plymouth. I am also 1981. It means built to a high standard by Fairways Marine. Like me, the owner has installed a new 30hp Beta engine. The engine cost me installed about £12,000. His asking price is £20,000 and I am sure he will accept less. The 35 can sail anywhere. You have a large double fore cabin. two singles in the aft cabin and can sleep two in the saloon double. The boat is ideal for a couple with kids or occasional guests. The centreboard casing makes the saloon cosy and is also good underway. The galley is on the starboard side, the U shaped settee to port separated by the centre board casing.

The Plymouth based 35 has extensive equipment including wind vane steering which is excellent on a passage.

Chris

I’ll just add that in addition to the expense of wraparound sails, it also means you can’t mount any of the conventional accoutrements you find on modern masts like radar or steaming/deck lights. obviously, Radar could be on a post on the transom (like on my Freedom 45), but I liked having the steaming light on the foremast and the radar on the mizzen on my Freedom 40.

I can’t argue with the aerodynamics, but there are other compromises as well.

Your point is well taken. There are always compromises. My radar is mounted on a post on the transom.

Had the Freedom 70 won the Whitbread, the publicity would have led to more people choosing the unstayed rig with wraparound sails and wishbone booms. The 70 took the size to a new dimension. I was on board when the 70 raced in the Southampton to Cherbourg race and won by over 5 hours on actual time. Admittedly we were the largest boat, the wind picked up to Force 7 at the Needles on the beam, we had one reef in each the the three identical mainsails. We went across the Channel at 17-20 knots. The crew was the one for the Whitbread. We were given a handicap for that race that we calculated required a mast 237ft high to carry the sail area.

Hi Chris;

The boat I am considering: Freedom 47 Pilothouse for sale UK, Freedom boats for sale, Freedom used boat sales, Freedom Sailing Yachts For Sale 1989 Freedom 47 Pilothouse - Apollo Duck

I am Really trying to do my due diligence on it, as ‘everything’ is unknown to me, and this is made more difficult to accomplish as I’m not in the UK, though if I get enough positive feedback I would obviously book a ticket. I’d love to know it’s history, have a survey done, and to really have my feet on her to better understand what I’d be getting myself into.

She’s got a very unusual layout to be sure, and I’d feel compelled to do a fair bit of interior work to get her into my desired configuration, but I do love the workshop, double water-tight compartments, the Pilot House, and the ‘bones’ of it in general. My intention for the vessel would be for a full-time live-aboard while plying the world’s oceans. She seems a sensible choice for the retired single-hander that I am…

Any thoughts would be most appreciated.

Robert

Robert,

I was unaware that this one-off Freedom 47 existed. It is an interesting boat with an unusual layout. My immediate comment would be the layout which will restrict any resale value and make the potential market very small. . For a 47ft boat, she has limited sleeping cabin space. On a boat of this size, two separate double berth cabins would be normal. I suggest that you compare her to the Freedom 45 designed by Gary Mull to see what I mean. There are several for sale in the US and one in Essex.

As I am in London, would you like me to visit the boat in Essex and inspect her. I can contact the agents and ask a host of relevant questions. I have owned many boats over the years including three Freedoms and was CEO of the volume builder of Freedoms in Europe from 1980 until late 1982. Subsequently, I owned two Freedom 35s and a second generation Freedom 38 designed by Gary Mull.

Both Everett Pearson (who built Freedoms in the US and made all the masts) and Gary Hoyt are no longer with us but I know the chief designer of the masts (with whom I am actively in touch with) and the former CEO of Freedom Yachts which took over from Tillotson-Pearson as the builder before folding. I commissioned Ron Holland to build the Freedom 39 pilothouse second generation Freedom and built the three masted Freedom 70. There is little that I do not know about Freedoms and their rigs. I have also cruised over 40,000 sea miles on my own boats including the Pacific, Atlantic, Med and northern Europe - I was owner, skipper, navigator, chief engineer, galley cook and deckhand.

The Freedom 45 would be an ideal boat to cruise on. You can buy a good one for circa US75,000 (circa £54,000).

My immediate question is where was the 47 built. Freedom Yachts implies the American builder and not in England. My point is what is the electrical specification - US or Europe. This is relevant when it comes to your cruising intentions. Where have you done your sailing? Will you sail solo or with someone? You will need wind vane steering if solo.

The 47 was built to suit the original owner. You need good berth at anchor or berthed and a good berth at sea. The 47 has two heads and showers, both aft. That is unusual. I can contact the retired chief engineer of TP who would have made the masts for this boat and find out what he can add to the story. It will be much more than the broker.

Which part of the world are you currently?

Best wishes,
Chris

Robert,

It may be easier if we email each other directly. My private email addresses are:
crlsamuelson@gmail.com
crlsamuelson@me.com

Chris

:folded_hands: Email sent Chris…

R