Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)
Yes I agree 20-1 is better of course. I just
wanted to mention the track which solves the rod popping out problem.
The things I like about the boomkicker are
a matter of preference (softer in terms of shock, clears my lifelines and dodger
easier).
Otherwise I would have gone with the garhauer.
Not trying to argue.
Alan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.
From:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul McFadden
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006
3:32 PM
To:
freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Re:
[freedomyachts2003] Boomkicker - Freedom32
Like I said Alan, I’m sure there are people out there, etc,
etc… That being said, It’s a hell of a lot easier to counteract the
spring pressure with a 20 to 1 purchase, as opposed to a 4 or 5 to 1. In
addition, it takes the teeth out of vang adjustment in heavier conditions when
you need it
It’s all a matter of personal preference.
PWM
Alan Kusinitz <akusinitz@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Well I don’t know about elite club J but I am happy with my
boom kickers.
The positioning of the boom attachment is
critical. It allows a few inches of travel upwards and then the rods pop out.
The few inches can work on some boats depending on the angle and the reef point
angle. However they have an option for a short track you screw to the
bottom of the boom and then you have a very large range so the rods will not
pop out. My old sails were okay without the track but my new ones were not so I
added the track (it can be varying lengths I think used 12 or 18 inches.
It is true when you pull on the vang you
are countering the force of the rods but most rigid vangs have the same issue
with spring pressure. I do not find it a problem.
Alan
\
The information contained in this e-mail
and any attachments is intended only for the personal and confidential use of
the recipient(s) named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if
so marked. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.
\
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul McFadden
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006
7:14 PM
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re:
[freedomyachts2003] Boomkicker - Freedom32
The Boom-kicker I had on my boat was the actual “Boom Kicker”
brand, which consisted basically of two fiberglass rods attached at the base of
the mast and on the underside of the boom at about a 45deg. angle. It really
only functioned as a support for the boom/sail weight by the flexing of the
fiberglass rods. The rod flex had to be maintained by either a standard rope
vang, or (if you’re adventurous) the tension of the main sheet.
Most of my problems came when reefing or when I needed to jibe,
especially in light air. Mine would “pop” out of the fitting on the
boom, crash down to the top of the cabin just when you need its support. Couple
that with the fact that you are fighting the spring tendency with your rope
vang constantly made me realize that this unit was not for me. As I said in my
previous post, I replaced it with a Garhauer rigid vang and haven’t looked back.
I’m sure there are probably people out there that love their
Boom-Kickers, but I’m not a member of that elite club.
PWM
PS, I don’t know who provided the OEM vang…P
Kevin Taylor
<kevin683@gmail.com> wrote:
What was it that specifically bothered you about the boomkicker? BTW,
does boomkicker refer to the factory installed boom vang?
–Kevin
On 10/2/06, Paul McFadden <pwhitmac@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Hey Sward,
When I purchased my H32 it was fitted with a BoomKicker. After I used it a
few times I have to say (with all due respect to present owners) that I
couldn’t get it off the boat quick enough. I installed a Garhauer rigid
vang
and have never looked back. It’s a great piece of gear @ a great price.
Couldn’t be happier. I highly recommend it!
PWM
Ps; I’m not affiliated with Garhauer. If you want more info and pic’s,
email
me direct.
swardfullsail <swardfullsail@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Has anyone ever used a boomkicker? I would like a topping lift or
something to hold the boom up higher. I have ruined my bimini top
from the boom resting on it. I have adjusted the lazyjacks however,
that doesn’t seem to correct the problem. Also when the lazyjacks are
adjusted they don’t fit properly in the mainsail cover. Always
something!!
Sward
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call
rates.
\
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone
call rates.
\
Do
you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new
Yahoo! Mail.
\