Posted by yottydotty (mikedavidwilliams@…>)
Was there a cut-off based on hull numbers between the standard and
tall rigs, or was it an option such that boats from a certain time
onwards could have either? (Of course owners could have changed
afterwards)
Or does it change with the rigs - e.g. centreboard short, fixed keel
tall etc?
I have searched through the forums but cant find any clues…
Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)
It was an option after a certain point. However
the tall rig was only available with the deeper keel. The shoal keel sailplan
was the same as for the centerboard. That’s my understanding. The tall
rig had about an extra 5 ft of height on the mainmast which according to the
freedom sailpan gave it an extra 35 sq ft of mainsail in the non wishbone
version of the sailplan.
Alan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail,
and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yottydotty
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:03
AM
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [freedomyachts2003]
Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
Was there a cut-off based on hull numbers between the
standard and
tall rigs, or was it an option such that boats from a certain time
onwards could have either? (Of course owners could have changed
afterwards)
Or does it change with the rigs - e.g. centreboard short, fixed keel
tall etc?
I have searched through the forums but cant find any clues…
\
Posted by Jerome Weinraub (zayde@…>)
What draft was the tall rig?
----- Originl Message -----
From: Alan Kusinitz
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: [freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
It was an option after a certain point. However the tall rig was only available with the deeper keel. The shoal keel sailplan was the same as for the centerboard. That’s my understanding. The tall rig had about an extra 5 ft of height on the mainmast which according to the freedom sailpan gave it an extra 35 sq ft of mainsail in the non wishbone version of the sailplan.
Alan
\
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yottydottySent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:03 AMTo: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.comSubject: [freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
Was there a cut-off based on hull numbers between the standard andtall rigs, or was it an option such that boats from a certain timeonwards could have either? (Of course owners could have changedafterwards)Or does it change with the rigs - e.g. centreboard short, fixed keeltall etc?I have searched through the forums but cant find any clues…
\
Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)
I think a little over 5 feet as well.
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail,
and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerome Weinraub
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:56
AM
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [freedomyachts2003]
Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
What draft was the tall rig?
----- Originl Message -----
From: Alan Kusinitz
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13,
2006 9:39 AM
Subject: RE:
[freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
\
It was an option after a certain point. However the tall rig was
only available with the deeper keel. The shoal keel sailplan was the same as
for the centerboard. That’s my understanding. The tall rig had about an
extra 5 ft of height on the mainmast which according to the freedom sailpan
gave it an extra 35 sq ft of mainsail in the non wishbone version of the
sailplan.
Alan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of yottydotty
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:03
AM
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [freedomyachts2003]
Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
Was there
a cut-off based on hull numbers between the standard and
tall rigs, or was it an option such that boats from a certain time
onwards could have either? (Of course owners could have changed
afterwards)
Or does it change with the rigs - e.g. centreboard short, fixed keel
tall etc?
I have searched through the forums but cant find any clues…
\
Posted by Jerome Weinraub (zayde@…>)
Mine(#68) draws 4.5 ft,the mainmast is 45 total length. I’ve never questioned what configuration it was.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Kusinitz
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:02 AM
Subject: RE: [freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
I think a little over 5 feet as well.
\
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerome WeinraubSent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:56 AMTo: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
What draft was the tall rig?
----- Originl Message -----
From: Alan Kusinitz
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: [freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
It was an option after a certain point. However the tall rig was only available with the deeper keel. The shoal keel sailplan was the same as for the centerboard. That’s my understanding. The tall rig had about an extra 5 ft of height on the mainmast which according to the freedom sailpan gave it an extra 35 sq ft of mainsail in the non wishbone version of the sailplan.
Alan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yottydottySent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:03 AMTo: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.comSubject: [freedomyachts2003] Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
Was there a cut-off based on hull numbers between the standard andtall rigs, or was it an option such that boats from a certain timeonwards could have either? (Of course owners could have changedafterwards)Or does it change with the rigs - e.g. centreboard short, fixed keeltall etc?I have searched through the forums but cant find any clues…
\
Posted by Skip Turpin (skipperf33@…>)
My 1982 F33CK #63 Fixed Keel 4.5’Draft has 40’(over all) Masts.
Skip
Posted by Alan Kusinitz (akusinitz@…>)
On the Freedom Sail plan the luff length
for the mainsail for the tall rig is 38” 9” and about 5’
less for the normal rig. So yours sounds like a “shoal” draft fixed
keel like mine.
Alan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above and may be subject to attorney client privilege if so marked. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail,
and delete the original message.
From: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com [mailto:freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Skip Turpin
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:40
PM
To: freedomyachts2003@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [freedomyachts2003] Re:
Freedom 33 - Was the Tall Rig an option or a revision?
My 1982 F33CK #63 Fixed Keel 4.5’Draft has 40’(over
all) Masts.
Skip
\