Posted by george huffman (thatboatguy2@…>)
It’s a very well written and thought out post Macks, I can’t get my teeth into it at any point and maybe only a fingernail here and there so I feel we have reached that point at which I’ll raise my morning coffee cup to you, Dentist number 5 and move along. George— On Fri, 11/21/08, macks011 <macks02@…> wrote:From: macks011 <macks02@…>Subject: [FreedomOwnersGroup] Re: Hull thicknessTo: FreedomOwnersGroup@yahoogroups.comDate: Friday, November 21, 2008, 8:33 AM
Hi George: You bring up a point that I feel requires some more
discussion: …“I would not dream of attaching or installing anything
near or below the waterline with anything but 5200.”…There should
be no need, in a properly designed application, to rely on the
adhesive properties of 5200 in a through hull installation. A well
designed thru hull consists of a thru hull fitting, the hull, a
backing plate and a seacock in a mechanical sandwich. The hull and
backing plate connection, being permenant, can be epoxied or 5200’ed
in place. The seacock is lagged into the backing plate or thrubolted
and that is where the forces on the system are the greatest and are
taken care of mechanically. The thru hull fitting (having a machine
thread) will run up as far as is allowed by the thickness of the
hull. There should be NO mechanical forces on the thru hull fitting
itself other than compression. The sealant to be used, in forseeably
removable installation, is a polysulfide.
If you want to bed a bobstay, anchor roller,or swim platform, 5200 is
fine. You want to add a sugar scoop, repair a hull/deck joint or re
bed a keel, skeg, or strut: 5200 is your tool of choice. However, in
foreseeably impermenant installations (nice alliteration) it is not.
One more point regarding professional opinion; 4 0ut of five dentists
and all that? I’m the 5th dentist. (grin)
Oh its on now Macks! heh heh
But on the serious side let it be known that the following is meant
in the spirit of information and oppinion sharing; is in no way
personal, and is not intended to inflame.
Actually 5200 is both adhesive and sealant. If I want to remove
that through hull (even after the 52 day nominal cure time) I can do
it quite easily because I know how.
I would not dream of
attaching or installing anything near or below the waterline with
anything but 5200. I realize this is opinion but it is a
professional opinion that is widely shared. As for a bigger
hammer… well… whenever I’m criticized for overkill where crew
safety is involved I just smile and carry on.
Incidently, some
teak cleaners will soften 5200 over time. Just an FYI for anyone
with a teak rubrail or trim near a hull/deck joint that has been
assembled with 5200.
But thanks for watching my 6 on that silicone issue. 
Next I think we should maybe discuss the merits of guns onboard or
maybe best anchor… 
George
— On Thu, 11/20/08, macks011 <macks02@… > wrote:
From: macks011 <macks02@… >
Subject: [FreedomOwnersGroup ] Re: Hull thickness
To: FreedomOwnersGroup@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2008, 8:13 AM
Please, I don’t want to start a flame war, but: 5200 or
any variant
is a polyurethane. Polyurethane is an ADEHESIVE and as such should
never be used for anything you might have to remove. Some of the
few
marine uses are hull/deck joints, hull/keel joints and mast step
beddings.
Below and above waterline hardwere should be bedded with a
Polysulfide. Polysulfide is a CAULK and/or Bedding Compound and is
the best all around material for these jobs.
Last but not least is Silicone. Silicone has high flex
properties
and its primary purpose is in bedding portlights.
We all hve a tendency to use a bigger hammer, more is better
and
all that. 5200 will not prevent a leak, it will only make it a
bitch
to fix one.
— In FreedomOwnersGroup@ yahoogroups. com, “George Huffman”
<thatboatguy2@ …> wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me how thick our hull is. Two inches
thick
including an inch of balsa. I just made a hole for an a/c thru
hull
(exit) and installed a bronze through hull (don’t cringe Skip I
used
5200!
). I was also proud and happy to see how dry that core
was.
Freedom 40 CK CC Hull number 7
George
\