Posted by Scott Forgey (jsforgey@…>)
When the new bridge (54’) at 17th Street
Causeway finally got done (Government projects, ugh) the first time we went
under I timed the tide and slid under foot by foot. I sent one of
my kids up the mast to get a good look.
I was sure it was going to hit, but we missing the antenna by a
good 5FT at low tide…and the marker seemed right on. Whew.
Not so fortunate was a guy from Israel who bought a hunter
38. He was a bit cavalier, hit the bridge and brought the rig down…horrible
mess. I asked him what happened. He said he just bought the boat
and didn’t know the height but it ”looked good” to him.
Wow. I wonder what happened to him. He said he was going to learn
to sail on the way to the Bahamas and then sail it back to Israel.
Scott Forgey
21362 Summertrace Circle
Boca Raton, FL 33428
561.445.5179
skype: sforgey1
“Nothing is ever wrong in the universe, there is only
what’s missing!”
W. Erhard
From:
FreedomOwnersGroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FreedomOwnersGroup@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Ian Goodwin
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:31 PM
To: FreedomOwnersGroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FreedomOwnersGroup] Re: Tickling bridges with antennas…
\
Talk about tickling bridges! I have a 62 foot mast and
regularly travel the ICW where the highest (new) bridges are 64
feet. We don’t attempt to go under those bridges unless the height as
shown at the water line is at least 64 feet. Every one of those 64
foot bridges we go under looks like we are going to hit for sure. The
antenna often bends as we go under. We go under slowly and watch the
tides.
----- Original Message ----
From: Herman and Gail Schiller <hschiller2@…>
To: FreedomOwnersGroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:18:41 PM
Subject: Re: [FreedomOwnersGroup] Re: Tickling bridges with antennas…
I was on board the sloop Clearwater when it
went under the
Newburgh-Beacon bridge that carries I-84 across the Hudson River.
Although that bridge is about 185’ above water, from the point of
view on deck, I thought she’d hit for sure. There’s something about
the presence of the mast that fools the eye’s depth perception. Herm
At 05:53 PM 7/28/2008, you wrote:
There is nothing more deceptive than the appearance of the proximity
of an overhead obstruction to the mast head of a boat that you are on.
I’ve heard conversations between numerous boats wherein the first to
approach a bridge required significant encouragement from one behind
to go under a bridge
“I don’t think I can clear this bridge”
“You’ve got it, easy”
“Are you SURE”
“Yeah, plenty of room”
“Doesn’t look like it from here”
“I’d turn around if I wasn’t under sail and in a channel”
etc. etc. etc.
(upon clearing the bridge)
“I guess you were right”
“Man, you had 5’ of clearance from where I could see”
I used to sail a Hobie 16 on Lake Travis (near Austin, Texas). There
was an electrical transmission line that stretched (a long way)
across the lake, with a huge tower on each bank. I absolutely refused
to go under it until I saw a MUCH larger sailboat “make it”. I
had
that feeling EVERY time I went under it. The minimum distance from
the bottom of the arc of those lines to the lake surface (when full
to the spillway) was…I kid you not…One Hundred and Sixty Four
FEET.
— In
<mailto:FreedomOwn ersGroup% 40yahoogroups. com>FreedomOwnersGroup@
yahoogroups. com,
“Scott Forgey”
<jsforgey@. …> wrote:
I know mine on my F-32 is less than 54’ because the 17th Street
Causeway
bridge in Ft. Lauderdale is 55’ and I still have a mast!
Yesterday was a really high tide and the antenna just barely missed.
Everyone always looks up and waits for the crash. Fun to watch.
Scott Forgey
21362 Summertrace Circle
Boca Raton, FL 33428
561.445.5179
skype: sforgey1
“Nothing is ever wrong in the universe, there is only what’s
missing!”
W. Erhard
From:
<mailto:FreedomOwne rsGroup%40yahoog roups.com>FreedomOwnersGroup@
yahoogroups. com
[mailto:FreedomOwnersGroup@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Herman
and
Gail
Schiller
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:17 PM
To:
<mailto:FreedomOwne rsGroup%40yahoog roups.com>FreedomOwnersGroup@
yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [FreedomOwnersGroup ] Tickling briges with antennas…
My F-28 brochures state 4’6", but measurement says
4’10" Herm
At 12:03 PM 7/27/2008, you wrote:
I never actually used a tape to measure the total height of
antenna
above the waterline, but used 49 feet for clearance requirements
on our
F30.
You can put the number together as follows:
F30 Mainsail luff length (front edge) is 35 feet 3 inches. It
would
easy to measure from the tack, where the sail attached to the
forward end of the boom, down to the water…and to eyeball the
distance from the top of the headboard ring to the top of the
highest masthead fittings (maybe an antenna). Total should add up
to about 48 feet, plus or minus.
Mauri Pro Sailing lists the sail dimensions of all Freedoms at:
HYPERLINK
"<http://www.mauripro sailing.com/ techinfo/ boatspecs/ Rig%>http://www.mauripro
sailing.com/ techinfo/ boatspecs/ Rig%
20F.htm"http://www.mahttp://www.ma
uriprosailing. com/techinfo/ boatspecs/ Rig%20F.htm
Freedom 25 luff length is 29.2 or 30 feet, depending on rig.
One the other end of things, the draft spec from Freedom is often
quoted as 4’ 6". That number shows up in their lovely
brochure for
the shallow draft model. Our boat measured very close to 4’
11"
from the bottom of the keel to the bottom of the lower factory
waterline stripe. Freedom cheated a bit on the numbers… (but
otherwise built a great boat this is holding up very well…so
I
forgive them)
Fargo
ex F30 #12
— On Sun, 7/27/08, Lola Jackson <HYPERLINK
“mailto:lolaltd% 40yahoo.com”
lolaltd@. …> wrote:
From: Lola Jackson <HYPERLINK
“mailto:lolaltd% 40yahoo.com” lolaltd@. …>
Subject: Re: [FreedomOwnersGroup ] Tickling briges with
antennas…
To: HYPERLINK
"mailto:FreedomOwne rsGroup%
40yahoogroups. com"FreedomOwner sGroup@yahoogrou ps.
com
Date: Sunday, July 27, 2008, 11:19 AM
My F30 says 47…Lola
----- Original Message ----
From: mbb05055 <mary.bigelow@ hotmail.com>
To: FreedomOwnersGroup@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:10:16 AM
Subject: [FreedomOwnersGroup ] Tickling briges with antennas…
Does anyone know the F30 bridge clearance? I can’t help out the
F25
with the same question. Maybe somebody can help me. I think its
around 54’ but not really sure. I have never seen it in the
specs.
(I suppose that some day I could try to measure up the component
parts)
We are about to leave Maine to sail up to Bay of Fundy and St
John
New
Brunswick and then up the St John River which is a fine place to
sail.
I am not truly worried; more like curious. I do know we tickled
the
underbelly of the Jonesport (ME) bridge with out antenna at near
low
tide (!) Not quite as bad as it sounds. Russell (dh) brilliantly
backed up to the bridge very gently under power so we could
easily
pull away if we had to. Still pretty memorable… .
Mary
F30 Corydora
Belfast ME
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1576 - Release Date:
7/27/2008
4:16 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1576 - Release Date:
7/27/2008
4:16 PM
\
\
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.7/1580 - Release Date: 7/29/2008 5:26
PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.7/1580 - Release Date: 7/29/2008 5:26 PM